Athlon Gold 7220U vs FX-8320

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8320
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.56
+14.8%

FX-8320 outperforms Athlon Gold 7220U by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320 and Athlon Gold 7220U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15451634
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency2.6018.84
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8320 and Athlon Gold 7220U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm6 nm
Die size315 mm2100 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320 and Athlon Gold 7220U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FP6
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Athlon Gold 7220U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Athlon Gold 7220U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Athlon Gold 7220U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Athlon Gold 7220U.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320 3.56
+14.8%
Athlon Gold 7220U 3.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8320 5444
+14.9%
Athlon Gold 7220U 4740

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8320 460
Athlon Gold 7220U 1014
+120%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8320 1809
Athlon Gold 7220U 2120
+17.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.56 3.10
Recency 23 October 2012 20 September 2022
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 15 Watt

FX-8320 has a 14.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon Gold 7220U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The FX-8320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Gold 7220U in performance tests.

Note that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Athlon Gold 7220U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Athlon Gold 7220U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320
FX-8320
AMD Athlon Gold 7220U
Athlon Gold 7220U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1376 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 97 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 7220U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320 or Athlon Gold 7220U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.