Ryzen 9 7900X vs FX-8170
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 200 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.27 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (13 years ago) | 27 September 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-8170 and Ryzen 9 7900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 2x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 47 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | CCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8170 and Ryzen 9 7900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8170 and Ryzen 9 7900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 5 nm (CCD), 6 nm (I/O) nm, 0.650 - 1.475V |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8170 and Ryzen 9 7900X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8170 and Ryzen 9 7900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-5200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8170 and Ryzen 9 7900X.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 27 September 2022 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
| Threads | 8 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 170 Watt |
FX-8170 has 36% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 7900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-8170 and AMD Ryzen 9 7900X. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
