EPYC 9254 vs FX-8150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8150
2011
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.04
EPYC 9254
2022, $2,299
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
36.30
+1094%

EPYC 9254 outperforms FX-8150 by a whopping 1094% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1875119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.72
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.037.66
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date12 October 2011 (14 years ago)10 November 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of FX-8150 and EPYC 9254: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.15 GHz
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size315 mm24x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million26,280 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.0125 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8150 and EPYC 9254 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+SP5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8150 and EPYC 9254. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8150 and EPYC 9254 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8150 and EPYC 9254. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8150 and EPYC 9254.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-8150 3.04
EPYC 9254 36.30
+1094%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-8150 5325
Samples: 2441
EPYC 9254 64001
+1102%
Samples: 18

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8150 445
EPYC 9254 2071
+365%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8150 1759
EPYC 9254 16377
+831%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.04 36.30
Recency 12 October 2011 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 200 Watt

FX-8150 has 60% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9254, on the other hand, has a 1094% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 9254 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-8150 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8150 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9254 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 494 votes

Rate FX-8150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5 votes

Rate EPYC 9254 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-8150 and EPYC 9254, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.