Celeron M 630 MHz vs FX-8140

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8140 and Celeron M 630 MHz processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1637not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency3.05no data
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)no data
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8140 and Celeron M 630 MHz basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz0.63 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache8 MBno data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-8140 and Celeron M 630 MHz compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8140 and Celeron M 630 MHz. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8140 and Celeron M 630 MHz are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8140 and Celeron M 630 MHz. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8140 and Celeron M 630 MHz.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 5 Watt

FX-8140 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 630 MHz, on the other hand, has 1800% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-8140 and Celeron M 630 MHz. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8140 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 630 MHz is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8140 and Celeron M 630 MHz, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8140
FX-8140
Intel Celeron M 630 MHz
Celeron M 630 MHz

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 51 vote

Rate FX-8140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron M 630 MHz on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8140 or Celeron M 630 MHz, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.