Xeon w3-2535 vs FX-8100

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8100 and Xeon w3-2535 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1736not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.54no data
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$739

Detailed specifications

FX-8100 and Xeon w3-2535 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads820
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache384 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)26.25 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-8100 and Xeon w3-2535 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8100 and Xeon w3-2535. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

FX-8100 and Xeon w3-2535 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8100 and Xeon w3-2535 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8100 and Xeon w3-2535. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8100 and Xeon w3-2535.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2011 24 August 2024
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 8 20
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 185 Watt

FX-8100 has 94.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon w3-2535, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and 25% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

We couldn't decide between FX-8100 and Xeon w3-2535. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8100 is a desktop processor while Xeon w3-2535 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8100 and Xeon w3-2535, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8100
FX-8100
Intel Xeon w3-2535
Xeon w3-2535

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 64 votes

Rate FX-8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w3-2535 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8100 or Xeon w3-2535, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.