Xeon 6766E vs FX-8100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2044not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.04no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release date12 October 2011 (14 years ago)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,257

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of FX-8100 and Xeon 6766E: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)144
Threads8144
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache384 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB4 MB (per module)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)108 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-8100 and Xeon 6766E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8100 and Xeon 6766E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

FX-8100 and Xeon 6766E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8100 and Xeon 6766E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8100 and Xeon 6766E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-6400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8100 and Xeon 6766E.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data88

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2011 3 June 2024
Physical cores 8 144
Threads 8 144
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 250 Watt

FX-8100 has 163% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6766E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and 1700% more physical cores and 1700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between AMD FX-8100 and Intel Xeon 6766E. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8100 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6766E is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 77 votes

Rate FX-8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon 6766E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-8100 and Xeon 6766E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.