Ryzen AI 7 450 vs FX-8100
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2044 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 1.04 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Gorgon Point (2026) |
| Release date | 12 October 2011 (14 years ago) | 5 January 2026 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of FX-8100 and Ryzen AI 7 450: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 195 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8100 and Ryzen AI 7 450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8100 and Ryzen AI 7 450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8100 and Ryzen AI 7 450 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8100 and Ryzen AI 7 450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 860M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8100 and Ryzen AI 7 450.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 October 2011 | 5 January 2026 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen AI 7 450 has an age advantage of 14 years, 100% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 239% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-8100 and AMD Ryzen AI 7 450. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-8100 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 7 450 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
