Ryzen 5 4600G vs FX-8100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8100
2011
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.56
Ryzen 5 4600G
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.15
+296%

Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms FX-8100 by a whopping 296% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 4600G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1733764
Place by popularitynot in top-10026
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency2.5414.72
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 4600G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache384 KB384 KB
L2 cache8 MB3 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size315 mm2156 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 4600G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 4600G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 4600G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 4600G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 4600G.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8100 2.56
Ryzen 5 4600G 10.15
+296%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8100 4055
Ryzen 5 4600G 16071
+296%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8100 411
Ryzen 5 4600G 1581
+285%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8100 1819
Ryzen 5 4600G 6131
+237%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.56 10.15
Recency 12 October 2011 21 July 2020
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

FX-8100 has 33.3% more physical cores.

Ryzen 5 4600G, on the other hand, has a 296.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 50% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 4600G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 4600G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8100
FX-8100
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
Ryzen 5 4600G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 62 votes

Rate FX-8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2672 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8100 or Ryzen 5 4600G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.