EPYC 4464P vs FX-770K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-770K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.93
EPYC 4464P
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
30.54
+1482%

EPYC 4464P outperforms FX-770K by a whopping 1482% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-770K and EPYC 4464P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1966135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.97
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.8127.51
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release dateDecember 2014 (10 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-770K and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache256K64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size245 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C61 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-770K and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-770K and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-770K and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-770K and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-770K and EPYC 4464P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-770K 1.93
EPYC 4464P 30.54
+1482%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-770K 3060
EPYC 4464P 48518
+1486%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.93 30.54
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 105 Watt

FX-770K has 61.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4464P, on the other hand, has a 1482.4% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4464P is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-770K in performance tests.

Note that FX-770K is a desktop processor while EPYC 4464P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-770K and EPYC 4464P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-770K
FX-770K
AMD EPYC 4464P
EPYC 4464P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 7 votes

Rate FX-770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-770K or EPYC 4464P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.