Core 2 Duo E4300 vs FX-770K

Aggregate performance score

FX-770K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.81
+448%

FX-770K outperforms Core 2 Duo E4300 by a whopping 448% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21413263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.180.21
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Allendale (2006−2009)
Release dateDecember 2014 (10 years ago)July 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-770K and Core 2 Duo E4300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache256K64 KB
L2 cache4 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size245 mm2111 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million167 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on FX-770K and Core 2 Duo E4300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-770K and Core 2 Duo E4300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-770K and Core 2 Duo E4300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-770K and Core 2 Duo E4300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-770K and Core 2 Duo E4300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-770K and Core 2 Duo E4300.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-770K 1.81
+448%
Core 2 Duo E4300 0.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-770K 3172
+439%
Core 2 Duo E4300 588

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.81 0.33
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

FX-770K has a 448.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD FX-770K is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-770K
FX-770K
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
Core 2 Duo E4300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 7 votes

Rate FX-770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 153 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-770K and Core 2 Duo E4300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.