Celeron D 341 vs FX-770K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2206not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.96no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release dateDecember 2014 (11 years ago)September 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-770K and Celeron D 341 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.93 GHz
L1 cache256K16 KB
L2 cache4 MB256 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die size245 mm2109 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data68 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million125 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data1.25V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on FX-770K and Celeron D 341 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+PLGA478,PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt84 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-770K and Celeron D 341. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-770K and Celeron D 341 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-770K and Celeron D 341 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-770K and Celeron D 341. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-770K and Celeron D 341.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 84 Watt

FX-770K has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 29.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD FX-770K and Intel Celeron D 341. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-770K
FX-770K
Intel Celeron D 341
Celeron D 341

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 9 votes

Rate FX-770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 18 votes

Rate Celeron D 341 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-770K and Celeron D 341, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.