Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U vs FX-7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-7500
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
1.82
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 6 Watt
9.90
+444%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U outperforms FX-7500 by a whopping 444% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2191906
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency10.27no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date4 June 2014 (11 years ago)23 May 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-7500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cache4096 KB6 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size245 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors2,410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on FX-7500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt6 MB + 16 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz)
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-7500 1.82
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 9.90
+444%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-7500 3209
Samples: 353
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 17466
+444%
Samples: 147

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-7500 326
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 2069
+535%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-7500 700
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 7480
+969%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.82 9.90
Recency 4 June 2014 23 May 2023
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U has a 444% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 216.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-7500 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7500
FX-7500
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate FX-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 24 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-7500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.