EPYC 9275F vs FX-7500

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-7500 and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1913not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Kaverino data
Power efficiency10.06no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Turin (2024)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,439

Detailed specifications

FX-7500 and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size245 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors2,410 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-7500 and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7500 and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7500 and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7500 and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7500 and EPYC 9275F integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7500 and EPYC 9275F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7500 and EPYC 9275F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2014 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 320 Watt

FX-7500 has 1584.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-7500 and EPYC 9275F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FX-7500 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9275F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7500 and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7500
FX-7500
AMD EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9275F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 91 vote

Rate FX-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9275F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-7500 or EPYC 9275F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.