Athlon X2 QL-65 vs FX-7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-7500
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
1.83
+423%

FX-7500 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-65 by a whopping 423% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22273342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Kaveri2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency4.070.42
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date4 June 2014 (11 years ago)1 September 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-7500 and Athlon X2 QL-65 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rateno data3600 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors2,410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on FX-7500 and Athlon X2 QL-65 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP3S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7500 and Athlon X2 QL-65. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow++
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7500 and Athlon X2 QL-65 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7500 and Athlon X2 QL-65. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7500 and Athlon X2 QL-65 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7500 and Athlon X2 QL-65 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7500 and Athlon X2 QL-65.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-7500 1.83
+423%
Athlon X2 QL-65 0.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-7500 3209
+427%
Samples: 356
Athlon X2 QL-65 609

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

FX-7500 2060
+26.4%
Athlon X2 QL-65 1630

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

FX-7500 5482
+70.6%
Athlon X2 QL-65 3213

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

FX-7500 23.32
+67.2%
Athlon X2 QL-65 39

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

FX-7500 2771
+86.1%
Athlon X2 QL-65 1489

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 0.35
Recency 4 June 2014 1 September 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 35 Watt

FX-7500 has a 422.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 84.2% lower power consumption.

The AMD FX-7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon X2 QL-65 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7500
FX-7500
AMD Athlon X2 QL-65
Athlon X2 QL-65

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate FX-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 128 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-7500 and Athlon X2 QL-65, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.