Xeon 5080 vs FX-6350
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1962 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.90 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Dempsey (2006) |
| Release date | 29 April 2013 (12 years ago) | 23 May 2006 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $851 |
Detailed specifications
FX-6350 and Xeon 5080 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.73 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 0.07 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 16 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 2x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | 78 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 376 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 V | no data |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.075V-1.35V |
Compatibility
Information on FX-6350 and Xeon 5080 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | AM3+ | PLGA771 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6350 and Xeon 5080. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
FX-6350 and Xeon 5080 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6350 and Xeon 5080 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6350 and Xeon 5080. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6350 and Xeon 5080.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 April 2013 | 23 May 2006 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 130 Watt |
FX-6350 has an age advantage of 6 years, 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 103% more advanced lithography process, and 4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-6350 and Intel Xeon 5080. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-6350 is a desktop processor while Xeon 5080 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
