Ryzen 5 7500F vs FX-6350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6350
2013
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.94
Ryzen 5 7500F
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
17.40
+492%

Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms FX-6350 by a whopping 492% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6350 and Ryzen 5 7500F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1576338
Place by popularitynot in top-10028
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.7845.64
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Raphael
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)22 July 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$128 $304

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 7500F has 5751% better value for money than FX-6350.

Detailed specifications

FX-6350 and Ryzen 5 7500F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads612
Base clock speed3.9 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size315 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6350 and Ryzen 5 7500F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6350 and Ryzen 5 7500F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6350 and Ryzen 5 7500F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6350 and Ryzen 5 7500F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6350 and Ryzen 5 7500F.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6350 2.94
Ryzen 5 7500F 17.40
+492%

Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms FX-6350 by 492% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6350 4546
Ryzen 5 7500F 26919
+492%

Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms FX-6350 by 492% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-6350 485
Ryzen 5 7500F 2742
+465%

Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms FX-6350 by 465% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-6350 1537
Ryzen 5 7500F 12600
+720%

Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms FX-6350 by 720% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.94 17.40
Recency 29 April 2013 22 July 2023
Threads 6 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 5 7500F is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6350 and Ryzen 5 7500F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6350
FX-6350
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Ryzen 5 7500F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 348 votes

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1859 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7500F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6350 or Ryzen 5 7500F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.