Pentium D 950 vs FX-6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6300
2012, $132
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.36
+490%
Pentium D 950
2006, $637
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.40

FX-6300 outperforms Pentium D 950 by a whopping 490% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20353283
Place by popularity81not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.63no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.050.13
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Presler (2005−2007)
Release date23 October 2012 (13 years ago)16 January 2006 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132$637

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-6300 and Pentium D 950 have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of FX-6300 and Pentium D 950: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache288 KB16 KB (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB2 MB (per die)
L3 cache8192 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm22x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °CC1+D0=63 °C, B1=69 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million376 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Pentium D 950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+LGA775,PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Pentium D 950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-6300 and Pentium D 950 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Pentium D 950 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Pentium D 950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Pentium D 950.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-6300 2.36
+490%
Pentium D 950 0.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-6300 4137
+492%
Samples: 12678
Pentium D 950 699
Samples: 892

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.36 0.40
Recency 23 October 2012 16 January 2006
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 130 Watt

FX-6300 has a 490% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 103% more advanced lithography process, and 37% lower power consumption.

The AMD FX-6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium D 950 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4771 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 41 votes

Rate Pentium D 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-6300 and Pentium D 950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.