FX-4350 vs FX-6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.60
+24.4%
FX-4350
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
2.09

FX-6300 outperforms FX-4350 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and FX-4350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17311888
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.64no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.591.58
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)29 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and FX-4350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.5 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache288 KBno data
L2 cache6144 KB4096 KB
L3 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C61 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 VMin: 1.275 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and FX-4350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and FX-4350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and FX-4350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and FX-4350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and FX-4350.

PCIe version3.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6300 2.60
+24.4%
FX-4350 2.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6300 4137
+24.6%
FX-4350 3321

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-6300 456
+2.7%
FX-4350 444

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-6300 1431
+29.3%
FX-4350 1107

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

FX-6300 4900
+6.1%
FX-4350 4620

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 2.09
Recency 23 October 2012 29 April 2013
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

FX-6300 has a 24.4% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

FX-4350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months.

The FX-6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and FX-4350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
AMD FX-4350
FX-4350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4187 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 550 votes

Rate FX-4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or FX-4350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.