EPYC Embedded 8534P vs FX-6300
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2035 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 81 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.63 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.05 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (13 years ago) | 1 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $132 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of FX-6300 and EPYC Embedded 8534P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 288 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 4x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 35,500 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-6300 and EPYC Embedded 8534P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 200 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and EPYC Embedded 8534P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and EPYC Embedded 8534P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and EPYC Embedded 8534P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and EPYC Embedded 8534P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 1 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 64 |
| Threads | 6 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 200 Watt |
FX-6300 has 111% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 8534P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 967% more physical cores and 2033% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-6300 and AMD EPYC Embedded 8534P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-6300 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 8534P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
