Atom Z612 vs FX-6300
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2035 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 81 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.63 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 1.05 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Lincroft (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (13 years ago) | 4 May 2010 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $132 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of FX-6300 and Atom Z612: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | cDMI |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 9 |
| L1 cache | 288 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 65.2526 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-6300 and Atom Z612 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM3+ | Intel BGA 518 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 1 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Atom Z612. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Atom Z612 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Atom Z612. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR1, DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 3.2 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | PowerVR SGX535 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Atom Z612.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 4 May 2010 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 1 Watt |
FX-6300 has an age advantage of 2 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 41% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z612, on the other hand, has 9400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-6300 and Intel Atom Z612. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-6300 is a desktop processor while Atom Z612 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
