Opteron 6308 vs FX-6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1999not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.00no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Abu Dhabi (2012)
Release date27 February 2012 (13 years ago)5 November 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$501

Detailed specifications

FX-6200 and Opteron 6308 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache288 KB192 KB
L2 cache6144 KB2 MB (per module)
L3 cache8192 KB8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm22x 315 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6200 and Opteron 6308 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
SocketAM3+G34
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6200 and Opteron 6308. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6200 and Opteron 6308 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6200 and Opteron 6308. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6200 and Opteron 6308.

PCIe versionn/a2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 February 2012 5 November 2012
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 115 Watt

FX-6200 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Opteron 6308, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 8.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD FX-6200 and AMD Opteron 6308. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-6200 is a desktop processor while Opteron 6308 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6200
FX-6200
AMD Opteron 6308
Opteron 6308

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 160 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 6308 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-6200 and Opteron 6308, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.