Core 2 Solo SL3400 vs FX-6200
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2039 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.79 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | no data |
| Release date | 27 February 2012 (14 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of FX-6200 and Core 2 Solo SL3400: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 288 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V | no data |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.05V-1.15V |
Compatibility
Information on FX-6200 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3+ | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6200 and Core 2 Solo SL3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Security technologies
FX-6200 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6200 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6200 and Core 2 Solo SL3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6200 and Core 2 Solo SL3400.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 February 2012 | 1 January 2009 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 17 Watt |
FX-6200 has an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 41% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Solo SL3400, on the other hand, has 635% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-6200 and Intel Core 2 Solo SL3400. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-6200 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Solo SL3400 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
