Intel Celeron N5105 vs AMD FX-6200

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

FX-6200
2.67
+1.1%

FX-6200 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 1% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing FX-6200 and Celeron N5105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15861596
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.630.97
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years old)11 January 2021 (3 years old)
Current price$137 $1644
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron N5105 has 54% better value for money than FX-6200.

Technical specs

FX-6200 and Celeron N5105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache288 KBno data
L2 cache6144 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache8192 KB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6200 and Celeron N5105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6200 and Celeron N5105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

FX-6200 and Celeron N5105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6200 and Celeron N5105 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6200 and Celeron N5105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-6200 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by FX-6200 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-6200 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6200 and Celeron N5105.

PCIe versionn/ano data
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6200 2.67
+1.1%
Celeron N5105 2.64

FX-6200 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 1% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6200 4107
+1.2%
Celeron N5105 4058

FX-6200 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 1% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-6200 408
Celeron N5105 469
+15%

Celeron N5105 outperforms FX-6200 by 15% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-6200 1290
+0.7%
Celeron N5105 1281

FX-6200 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 1% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.67 2.64
Recency 27 February 2012 11 January 2021
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-6200 and Celeron N5105. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6200 and Celeron N5105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6200
FX-6200
Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 122 votes

Rate AMD FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 572 votes

Rate Intel Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6200 or Celeron N5105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.