A8-7680 vs FX-6200

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6200
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.57
+14.7%
A8-7680
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
2.24

FX-6200 outperforms A8-7680 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6200 and A8-7680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17451834
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.78
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD A8
Power efficiency1.944.71
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Excavator (2017−2018)
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)26 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$56

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6200 and A8-7680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplierno data38
L1 cache288 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6200 and A8-7680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6200 and A8-7680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6200 and A8-7680 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6200 and A8-7680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon R7 Series

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6200 and A8-7680.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6200 2.57
+14.7%
A8-7680 2.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6200 4075
+14.8%
A8-7680 3551

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.57 2.24
Recency 27 February 2012 26 October 2018
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

FX-6200 has a 14.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

A8-7680, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

The FX-6200 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7680 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6200 and A8-7680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6200
FX-6200
AMD A8-7680
A8-7680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 135 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 517 votes

Rate A8-7680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6200 or A8-7680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.