Xeon E3-1220L vs FX-6100

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6100
2011
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.41
+60.7%

FX-6100 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6100 and Xeon E3-1220L processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17912169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.316.84
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)3 April 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and Xeon E3-1220L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache288 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and Xeon E3-1220L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt20 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and Xeon E3-1220L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FDIno data-
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

FX-6100 and Xeon E3-1220L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Identity Protection-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and Xeon E3-1220L are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and Xeon E3-1220L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and Xeon E3-1220L.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6100 2.41
+60.7%
Xeon E3-1220L 1.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6100 3687
+60.7%
Xeon E3-1220L 2295

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-6100 381
Xeon E3-1220L 610
+60.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-6100 1226
+8%
Xeon E3-1220L 1135

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.41 1.50
Recency 12 October 2011 3 April 2011
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 4
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 20 Watt

FX-6100 has a 60.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Xeon E3-1220L, on the other hand, has 375% lower power consumption.

The FX-6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1220L in performance tests.

Note that FX-6100 is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1220L is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6100 and Xeon E3-1220L, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6100
FX-6100
Intel Xeon E3-1220L
Xeon E3-1220L

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1092 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1220L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6100 or Xeon E3-1220L, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.