FX-4100 vs FX-6100

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-6100
2011
6 cores / 6 threads
2.38
+41.7%

FX-6100 outperforms FX-4100 by 42% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6100 and FX-4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16761946
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.990.24
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date12 October 2011 (12 years ago)12 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$39 $28

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-6100 has 1146% better value for money than FX-4100.

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and FX-4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache288 KB192 KB
L2 cache6 MB4096 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and FX-4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and FX-4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and FX-4100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and FX-4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and FX-4100.

PCIe version2.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6100 2.38
+41.7%
FX-4100 1.68

FX-6100 outperforms FX-4100 by 42% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6100 3679
+41.2%
FX-4100 2605

FX-6100 outperforms FX-4100 by 41% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-6100 381
FX-4100 404
+6%

FX-4100 outperforms FX-6100 by 6% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-6100 1224
+19.6%
FX-4100 1023

FX-6100 outperforms FX-4100 by 20% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

FX-6100 4270
+29.4%
FX-4100 3300

FX-6100 outperforms FX-4100 by 29% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.38 1.68
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4

The FX-6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6100 and FX-4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6100
FX-6100
AMD FX-4100
FX-4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 970 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 818 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6100 or FX-4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.