Celeron N2808 vs FX-6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6100
2011
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.11
+654%

FX-6100 outperforms Celeron N2808 by a whopping 654% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20253342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency0.942.96
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)22 May 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and Celeron N2808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.3 GHz1.58 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.25 GHz
L1 cache288 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and Celeron N2808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and Celeron N2808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+

Security technologies

FX-6100 and Celeron N2808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and Celeron N2808 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and Celeron N2808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data10.66 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-6100 and Celeron N2808 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and Celeron N2808.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-6100 2.11
+654%
Celeron N2808 0.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-6100 3710
+643%
Samples: 3461
Celeron N2808 499
Samples: 58

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.11 0.28
Recency 12 October 2011 22 May 2014
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 4 Watt

FX-6100 has a 653.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Celeron N2808, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 2275% lower power consumption.

The AMD FX-6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N2808 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6100 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2808 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6100
FX-6100
Intel Celeron N2808
Celeron N2808

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1198 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 43 votes

Rate Celeron N2808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-6100 and Celeron N2808, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.