Itanium 9150N vs FX-4350
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2238 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.61 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | no data |
| Release date | 29 April 2013 (13 years ago) | 1 October 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of FX-4350 and Itanium 9150N: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 4 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 24 MB L3 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | 76 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.275 V - Max: 1.4 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4350 and Itanium 9150N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3+ | PPGA611 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 104 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4350 and Itanium 9150N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
FX-4350 and Itanium 9150N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4350 and Itanium 9150N are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4350 and Itanium 9150N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4350 and Itanium 9150N.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 April 2013 | 1 October 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 104 Watt |
FX-4350 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 181% more advanced lithography process.
Itanium 9150N, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-4350 and Intel Itanium 9150N. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-4350 is a desktop processor while Itanium 9150N is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
