Phenom II X3 N830 vs FX-4320

Primary details

Comparing FX-4320 and Phenom II X3 N830 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1835	2594
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.00	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	3x AMD Phenom II
Architecture codename	Vishera (2012−2015)	Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date	23 October 2012 (11 years ago)	12 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price	$53	$304

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

FX-4320 and Phenom II X3 N830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	3 (Tri-Core)
Threads	4	3
Base clock speed	4 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	4.1 GHz	2.1 GHz
Bus support	no data	3600 MHz
L1 cache	192 KB	no data
L2 cache	4096 KB	1.5 MB
L3 cache	4096 KB	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Die size	315 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,200 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on FX-4320 and Phenom II X3 N830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	AM3+	S1
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4320 and Phenom II X3 N830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V, DDR3-1333 memory controller
AES-NI	+	no data
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4320 and Phenom II X3 N830 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4320 and Phenom II X3 N830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3-1866

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4320 and Phenom II X3 N830.

PCIe version

Not Listed

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4320 outperforms Phenom II X3 N830 by 179% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.01	0.72
Recency	23 October 2012	12 May 2010
Physical cores	4	3
Threads	4	3
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4320 and Phenom II X3 N830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---