Pentium 967 vs FX-4320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-4320 and Pentium 967 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1838not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.00no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)2 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134
Current price$53 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4320 and Pentium 967 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed4 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz1.3 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache4096 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-4320 and Pentium 967 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4320 and Pentium 967. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA++
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

FX-4320 and Pentium 967 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4320 and Pentium 967 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4320 and Pentium 967. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.3 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-4320 and Pentium 967 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4320 and Pentium 967.

PCIe versionNot Listed2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-4320 3114
+384%
Pentium 967 643

FX-4320 outperforms Pentium 967 by 384% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 2 October 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 17 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-4320 and Pentium 967. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-4320 is a desktop processor while Pentium 967 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4320 and Pentium 967, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4320
FX-4320
Intel Pentium 967
Pentium 967

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 131 vote

Rate FX-4320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 6 votes

Rate Pentium 967 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4320 or Pentium 967, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.