E2-7110 vs FX-4320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4320
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.01
+35.8%

FX-4320 outperforms E2-7110 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4320 and E2-7110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18382077
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.00no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Carrizo-L (2015)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)7 May 2015 (9 years ago)
Current price$53 $385

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4320 and E2-7110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KB2048 KB
L3 cache4096 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million930 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-4320 and E2-7110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+FP4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt12-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4320 and E2-7110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data-
VirusProtectno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4320 and E2-7110 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+1
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4320 and E2-7110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3L-1600
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-4320 and E2-7110 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-4320 and E2-7110 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4320 and E2-7110.

PCIe versionNot Listed2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4320 2.01
+35.8%
E2-7110 1.48

FX-4320 outperforms E2-7110 by 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-4320 3114
+36.5%
E2-7110 2282

FX-4320 outperforms E2-7110 by 36% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.01 1.48
Recency 23 October 2012 7 May 2015
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 12 Watt

The FX-4320 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-7110 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4320 is a desktop processor while E2-7110 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4320 and E2-7110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4320
FX-4320
AMD E2-7110
E2-7110

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 131 vote

Rate FX-4320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 208 votes

Rate E2-7110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4320 or E2-7110, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.