Xeon D-1736NT vs FX-4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4300
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.94
Xeon D-1736NT
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 67 Watt
11.56
+496%

Xeon D-1736NT outperforms FX-4300 by a whopping 496% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4300 and Xeon D-1736NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1942669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.28no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)no data
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)1 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4300 and Xeon D-1736NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
L2 cache4096 KBno data
L3 cacheno data15 MB
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4300 and Xeon D-1736NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+FCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt67 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4300 and Xeon D-1736NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Statusno dataLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

FX-4300 and Xeon D-1736NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4300 and Xeon D-1736NT are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4300 and Xeon D-1736NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4300 and Xeon D-1736NT.

PCIe versionn/a4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4300 1.94
Xeon D-1736NT 11.56
+496%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4300 2986
Xeon D-1736NT 17826
+497%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.94 11.56
Recency 23 October 2012 1 January 2022
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 67 Watt

Xeon D-1736NT has a 495.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 41.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon D-1736NT is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4300 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4300 is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1736NT is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4300 and Xeon D-1736NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4300
FX-4300
Intel Xeon D-1736NT
Xeon D-1736NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1692 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1736NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4300 or Xeon D-1736NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.