PRO A6-8570 vs FX-4300

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-4300
2012
4 cores / 4 threads
1.93
+56.9%

FX-4300 outperforms PRO A6-8570 by 57% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4300 and PRO A6-8570 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18502207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.58no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)October 2018 (5 years ago)
Current price$66 $42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4300 and PRO A6-8570 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.8 GHz
L2 cache4096 KB1024 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4300 and PRO A6-8570 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4300 and PRO A6-8570. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTCno data1
FreeSyncno data1

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4300 and PRO A6-8570 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4300 and PRO A6-8570. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Switchable graphicsno data1

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-4300 and PRO A6-8570 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno datan/a

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-4300 and PRO A6-8570 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4300 and PRO A6-8570.

PCIe versionn/a3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4300 1.93
+56.9%
PRO A6-8570 1.23

FX-4300 outperforms PRO A6-8570 by 57% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-4300 2992
+57%
PRO A6-8570 1906

FX-4300 outperforms PRO A6-8570 by 57% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.93 1.23
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The FX-4300 is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A6-8570 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4300 and PRO A6-8570, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4300
FX-4300
AMD PRO A6-8570
PRO A6-8570

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1598 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 28 votes

Rate PRO A6-8570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4300 or PRO A6-8570, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.