Ultra 7 265 vs FX-4300

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-4300 and Core Ultra 7 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1988not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.35no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.87no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4300 and Core Ultra 7 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size315 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4300 and Core Ultra 7 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+1851
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4300 and Core Ultra 7 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

FX-4300 and Core Ultra 7 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4300 and Core Ultra 7 265 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4300 and Core Ultra 7 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4300 and Core Ultra 7 265.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Ultra 7 265 has 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-4300 and Core Ultra 7 265. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4300 and Core Ultra 7 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4300
FX-4300
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Core Ultra 7 265

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1742 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4300 or Core Ultra 7 265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.