Atom x3-C3405 vs FX-4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2298not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.36no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data3x Intel Atom
Power efficiency0.76no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Silvermont (2015)
Release date23 October 2012 (13 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of FX-4300 and Atom x3-C3405: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.4 GHz
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4300 and Atom x3-C3405 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4300 and Atom x3-C3405. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
GPIOno data5 x I2C

Security technologies

FX-4300 and Atom x3-C3405 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Bootno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4300 and Atom x3-C3405 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4300 and Atom x3-C3405. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR31x32 LPDDR2/3 1066
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data4.2 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-4300 and Atom x3-C3405 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data1
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by FX-4300 and Atom x3-C3405 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over eDPno data1280x800

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-4300 and Atom x3-C3405 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data9.3
OpenGLno dataES 3.0

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4300 and Atom x3-C3405.

PCIe versionn/ano data
USB revisionno data2.0 OTG
Number of USB portsno data1
UARTno data7 x USIF configurable

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

Atom x3-C3405 has a 14% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD FX-4300 and Intel Atom x3-C3405. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-4300 is a desktop processor while Atom x3-C3405 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1905 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x3-C3405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-4300 and Atom x3-C3405, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.