Atom Z515 vs FX-4170

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-4170 and Atom Z515 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1958not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.45no data
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)8 April 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-4170 and Atom Z515 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed4.2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data400 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache192 KB56 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm226 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4170 and Atom Z515 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt1.4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4170 and Atom Z515. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-4170 and Atom Z515 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4170 and Atom Z515 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4170 and Atom Z515. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3unknown

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4170 and Atom Z515.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4170 3034
+1292%
Atom Z515 218

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 February 2012 8 April 2009
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 1 Watt

FX-4170 has an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z515, on the other hand, has 12400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-4170 and Atom Z515. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-4170 is a desktop processor while Atom Z515 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4170 and Atom Z515, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4170
FX-4170
Intel Atom Z515
Atom Z515

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 80 votes

Rate FX-4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 4 votes

Rate Atom Z515 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4170 or Atom Z515, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.