Athlon II X4 631 vs FX-4170

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4170
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.91
+42.5%
Athlon II X4 631
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.34

FX-4170 outperforms Athlon II X4 631 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4170 and Athlon II X4 631 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19582244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.451.27
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)17 August 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-4170 and Athlon II X4 631 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache192 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4170 and Athlon II X4 631 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FM1
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4170 and Athlon II X4 631. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4170 and Athlon II X4 631 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4170 and Athlon II X4 631. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4170 and Athlon II X4 631.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4170 1.91
+42.5%
Athlon II X4 631 1.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4170 3034
+43%
Athlon II X4 631 2122

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-4170 464
+66.9%
Athlon II X4 631 278

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-4170 1201
+38.7%
Athlon II X4 631 866

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 1.34
Recency 27 February 2012 17 August 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 100 Watt

FX-4170 has a 42.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 months.

Athlon II X4 631, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

The FX-4170 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 631 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4170 and Athlon II X4 631, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4170
FX-4170
AMD Athlon II X4 631
Athlon II X4 631

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 80 votes

Rate FX-4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 107 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 631 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4170 or Athlon II X4 631, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.