Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs FX-4150

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4150
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.17
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
16.11
+642%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms FX-4150 by a whopping 642% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4150 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1867439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency2.0852.46
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-4150 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-4150 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+FP8
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4150 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4150 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4150 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4150 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4150 2.17
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 16.11
+642%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4150 3327
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 24659
+641%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.17 16.11
Recency 23 October 2012 1 October 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 28 Watt

FX-4150 has -75% more threads.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 642.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 239.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4150 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4150 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4150 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4150
FX-4150
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 23 votes

Rate FX-4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4150 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.