i3-1115G4 (IPU) vs FX-4150
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2107 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.84 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 2 September 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $281 |
Detailed specifications
FX-4150 and Core i3-1115G4 (IPU) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 144 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4150 and Core i3-1115G4 (IPU) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | Intel BGA 1449 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4150 and Core i3-1115G4 (IPU). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4150 and Core i3-1115G4 (IPU) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4150 and Core i3-1115G4 (IPU). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, LPDDR4X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Iris Xe-LP Graphics G4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4150 and Core i3-1115G4 (IPU).
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 2 September 2020 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
FX-4150 has 100% more physical cores.
i3-1115G4 (IPU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-4150 and Intel Core i3-1115G4 (IPU). We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-4150 is a desktop processor while Core i3-1115G4 (IPU) is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
