Ultra 3 205 vs FX-4150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2199not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.84no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date23 October 2012 (13 years ago)August 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$140

Detailed specifications

FX-4150 and Core Ultra 3 205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache192 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)15 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size315 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-4150 and Core Ultra 3 205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+1851
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt57 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4150 and Core Ultra 3 205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

FX-4150 and Core Ultra 3 205 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4150 and Core Ultra 3 205 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4150 and Core Ultra 3 205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4150 and Core Ultra 3 205.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-4150 3327
Samples: 44
Ultra 3 205 26193
+687%
Samples: 3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 57 Watt

Ultra 3 205 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 967% more advanced lithography process, and 67% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD FX-4150 and Intel Core Ultra 3 205. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 27 votes

Rate FX-4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 15 votes

Rate Core Ultra 3 205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-4150 and Core Ultra 3 205, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.