Xeon 6740P vs FX-4130
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6740P outperforms FX-4130 by a whopping 3221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2358 | 51 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.32 | 9.58 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.53 | 8.10 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Granite Rapids (2024−2026) |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 (13 years ago) | 24 February 2025 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $112 | $4,650 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon 6740P has 2894% better value for money than FX-4130.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of FX-4130 and Xeon 6740P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 288 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 2x 598 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4130 and Xeon 6740P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | AM3+ | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 270 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4130 and Xeon 6740P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
FX-4130 and Xeon 6740P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4130 and Xeon 6740P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4130 and Xeon 6740P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5(6400MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4130 and Xeon 6740P.
| PCIe version | n/a | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.56 | 51.81 |
| Recency | 27 August 2012 | 24 February 2025 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 48 |
| Threads | 4 | 96 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 270 Watt |
FX-4130 has 116% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6740P, on the other hand, has a 3221% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.
The Intel Xeon 6740P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-4130 in performance tests.
Note that FX-4130 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6740P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
