i3-2308M vs FX-4130
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2321 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.32 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i3 |
| Power efficiency | 1.32 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 (13 years ago) | 20 February 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $112 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
FX-4130 and Core i3-2308M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 149 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | 85 (PGA); 100(BGA) °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 624 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4130 and Core i3-2308M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM3+ | rPGA988B / BGA1023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 512 KB + 3 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4130 and Core i3-2308M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4130 and Core i3-2308M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4130 and Core i3-2308M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel HD Graphics 3000 (650 - 1100 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4130 and Core i3-2308M.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 August 2012 | 20 February 2011 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 512 Watt |
FX-4130 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores, and 309.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-4130 and Intel Core i3-2308M. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-4130 is a desktop processor while Core i3-2308M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
