Xeon E5345 vs FX-4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4100
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.69
+39.7%

FX-4100 outperforms Xeon E5345 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4100 and Xeon E5345 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20322314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Clovertown (2006−2007)
Release date12 October 2011 (12 years ago)14 November 2006 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-4100 and Xeon E5345 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz0.33 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB4 MB (per die)
L3 cache8192 KB8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data66 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and Xeon E5345 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+LGA771,PLGA771
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Xeon E5345. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

FX-4100 and Xeon E5345 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Xeon E5345 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Xeon E5345. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Xeon E5345.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4100 1.69
+39.7%
Xeon E5345 1.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4100 2610
+39.7%
Xeon E5345 1868

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-4100 402
+26%
Xeon E5345 319

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-4100 1019
Xeon E5345 1054
+3.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 1.21
Recency 12 October 2011 14 November 2006
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 80 Watt

FX-4100 has a 39.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5345, on the other hand, has 18.8% lower power consumption.

The FX-4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5345 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4100 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5345 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4100 and Xeon E5345, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
Intel Xeon E5345
Xeon E5345

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 847 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5345 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4100 or Xeon E5345, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.