Ryzen 3 7320U vs FX-4100

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-4100
2011
4 cores / 4 threads
1.69

Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms FX-4100 by a whopping 244% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 7320U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19471037
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.24no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Mendocino-U (Zen 2)
Release date12 October 2011 (12 years ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Current price$28 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 7320U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm6 nm
Die size315 mm2100 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 7320U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FP6
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 7320U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataLPDDR5-5500 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 7320U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 7320U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 7320U.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4100 1.69
Ryzen 3 7320U 5.82
+244%

Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms FX-4100 by 244% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-4100 2609
Ryzen 3 7320U 9006
+245%

Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms FX-4100 by 245% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-4100 404
Ryzen 3 7320U 1171
+190%

Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms FX-4100 by 190% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-4100 1021
Ryzen 3 7320U 3668
+259%

Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms FX-4100 by 259% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 5.82
Recency 12 October 2011 20 September 2022
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 3 7320U is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4100 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4100 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 7320U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 7320U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
Ryzen 3 7320U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 824 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 504 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7320U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4100 or Ryzen 3 7320U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.