Pentium 3558U vs FX-4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4100
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.63
+155%
Pentium 3558U
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.64

FX-4100 outperforms Pentium 3558U by a whopping 155% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4100 and Pentium 3558U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21112793
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Power efficiency1.644.07
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$161

Detailed specifications

FX-4100 and Pentium 3558U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cache8192 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and Pentium 3558U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Pentium 3558U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Pentium 3558U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Pentium 3558U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Pentium 3558U.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4100 1.63
+155%
Pentium 3558U 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4100 2615
+154%
Pentium 3558U 1028

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 0.64
Recency 12 October 2011 1 January 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

FX-4100 has a 154.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Pentium 3558U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The FX-4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 3558U in performance tests.

Note that FX-4100 is a desktop processor while Pentium 3558U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4100 and Pentium 3558U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
Intel Pentium 3558U
Pentium 3558U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 916 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 108 votes

Rate Pentium 3558U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4100 or Pentium 3558U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.