Opteron 6204 vs FX-4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2389not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.67no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release date12 October 2011 (14 years ago)14 November 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$455

Detailed specifications

FX-4100 and Opteron 6204 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache192 KB768 KB
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB (per module)
L3 cache8192 KB8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm22x 315 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and Opteron 6204 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
SocketAM3+G34
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Opteron 6204. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Opteron 6204 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Opteron 6204. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Opteron 6204.

PCIe versionn/a2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2011 14 November 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 115 Watt

FX-4100 has 21.1% lower power consumption.

Opteron 6204, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month.

We couldn't decide between AMD FX-4100 and AMD Opteron 6204. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-4100 is a desktop processor while Opteron 6204 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
AMD Opteron 6204
Opteron 6204

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 989 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 6204 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-4100 and Opteron 6204, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.