Opteron 3320 EE vs FX-4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4100
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.71
+35.7%

FX-4100 outperforms Opteron 3320 EE by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4100 and Opteron 3320 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20442301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Delhi (2012−2013)
Release date12 October 2011 (12 years ago)4 December 2012 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-4100 and Opteron 3320 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache192 KB192 KB
L2 cache4096 KB4096 KB
L3 cache8192 KB8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and Opteron 3320 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Opteron 3320 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Opteron 3320 EE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Opteron 3320 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Opteron 3320 EE.

PCIe versionn/a2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4100 1.71
+35.7%
Opteron 3320 EE 1.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4100 2610
+36.1%
Opteron 3320 EE 1918

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.71 1.26
Recency 12 October 2011 4 December 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

FX-4100 has a 35.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Opteron 3320 EE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 280% lower power consumption.

The FX-4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 3320 EE in performance tests.

Note that FX-4100 is a desktop processor while Opteron 3320 EE is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4100 and Opteron 3320 EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
AMD Opteron  3320 EE
Opteron 3320 EE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 850 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 3320 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4100 or Opteron 3320 EE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.