Athlon 750 vs FX-4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-4100 and Athlon 750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2069not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.64no data
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Thunderbird (1999−2000)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)29 November 1999 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Detailed specifications

FX-4100 and Athlon 750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz0.75 GHz
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cache8192 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm180 nm
Die size315 mm2102 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million22 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and Athlon 750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+A
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Athlon 750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Athlon 750 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Athlon 750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Athlon 750.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2011 29 November 1999
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

FX-4100 has an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 750, on the other hand, has 171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-4100 and Athlon 750. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4100 and Athlon 750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
AMD Athlon 750
Athlon 750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 889 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Athlon 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4100 or Athlon 750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.