EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 168 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Gorgon Halo | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 20 May 2026 (less than a year ago) | 14 March 2023 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC Embedded 9654: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 96 |
| Threads | 32 | 192 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 2x 70.6 mm2 | 12x 72 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 78,840 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC Embedded 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FP11 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 360 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC Embedded 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC Embedded 9654 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC Embedded 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | LPDDR5X | DDR5-4800 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 8065S | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC Embedded 9654.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 May 2026 | 14 March 2023 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 96 |
| Threads | 32 | 192 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 360 Watt |
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 555% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 9654, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 9654 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
