Ultra 9 285K vs EPYC Embedded 9654

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC Embedded 9654 and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated53
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.31
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data32.55
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date14 March 2023 (1 year ago)24 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC Embedded 9654 and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores9624 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads19224
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data250 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm3 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors78,840 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC Embedded 9654 and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP51851
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 9654 and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC Embedded 9654 and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 9654 and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 9654 and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 9654 and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 March 2023 24 October 2024
Physical cores 96 24
Threads 192 24
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 125 Watt

EPYC Embedded 9654 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 188% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC Embedded 9654 and Core Ultra 9 285K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC Embedded 9654 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC Embedded 9654 and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC Embedded 9654
EPYC Embedded 9654
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC Embedded 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 98 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC Embedded 9654 or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.